Same as in point 1 but mid-res having displacement map. A combination of 1 and 2, Point 2 for scattered nanomeshes for example if they don't use alpha.Ĥ. You do mesh decimation in zbrush with respect of vertex coloring and then go as usual in X-norml.ģ. With that method you wouldn't be able to bake all those tiny things into the height map but it's usually not necessary.Ģ. Xnormla would combine it with it's own baked normal map into base texture output. Then in X-normal you use that mid res object as Hi definition + that normal map of tiny details as base texture with "Base texture is a tangent-space normal map" checked in. You export low and middle res mesh with a normal map baked for that mid-res object having no hard edges. Pixologic seems never wanted to address unfortunately.ġ.
My problem with this is that I want to work on some really high-res meshes, using all the neat Zbrush tools like Nanomesh and Geometry HD, and it doesn't sound like this is feasible using Xnormal to bake.Īre there any tips or tricks for getting Zbrush to emit decent maps? Or should I just learn to deal with not being able to get the most out of Zbrush? What do people do with these absurdly-high-poly models you can make in Zbrush? Just beauty renders? I'm reading up on fixing some of these errors, but a lot of it comes down to "use xnormal instead," which would be more likeīlender -> Zbrush -> Xnormal -> Blender -> Unity So far, I've gotten everything to "work" except that I've found that Zbrush doesn't export very good normal maps. The pipeline I want to use is Blender (basemesh) -> Zbrush (sculpting/highpoly, retopo) -> Blender (texture painting) -> Unity (PBR material, poor-man's Toolbag) Alright, I'm coming back to 3d after a few years off my game, and I'm trying to get my workflow down.
0 kommentar(er)
